Capitol riot police testimony: What the first Congress hearing glaringly hearing left out.
On Tuesday, a U.S. Congressional select committee kicked off its probe into the Jan. 6 Capitol riot with testimony from two Capitol police officers and two members of the D.C. police force. They each shared harrowing accounts of how they battled with the pro-Trump mob. Officer Harry Dunn described how he and other Black officers were repeatedly called the n-word as their lives were threatened. D.C. officer Michael Fanone narrated the footage from his body camera, which showed him being dragged and beaten by the crowd. He recalled how he appealed to the rioters’ humanity, telling them he had kids, as at least one shouted back “kill him with his own gun.” The aftermath of the attack was evident on the officers’ faces. Capitol police sergeant Aquilino Gonell recalled how he suffered as he fought against the mob. D.C. officer Daniel Hodges, whose agonizing screams as he was being crushed between the mob and an entrance to the Capitol became a harrowing symbol of the day, said one rioter told him, “You will die on your knees.” Anyone who watched Donald Trump’s second impeachment trial will recognize a lot of these episodes, but allowing the officers who captured the footage to explain in their own words their trauma, and also resolve, added a haunting new layer to what we already knew. It was a compelling—and politically effective—way to begin the hearings. But it was also a fragmented one. While these officers are undoubtedly victims who were lucky to survive the “medieval battle” against the Trump mob, the first day of testimony at times felt frustratingly calculated. Of the dozens of officers present during the insurrection, among them were many who did nothing at all, or worse, appeared to cheer on the mob. One was taking selfies and holding the door open for rioters. Another officer was suspended after video surfaced of him wearing a MAGA hat and leaving the Capitol with several others to applause. Capitol police acting Chief Yogananda Pittman announced earlier this year that 35 Capitol officers were initially under investigation, and several were suspended. Those investigations remain ongoing. I documented the mayhem as it unfolded myself on Jan. 6. I watched as two brave Capitol officers tried to secure a door on their own, as they were overpowered by dozens of rioters. Inside, I also saw officers standing aside, calmly watching as rioters flooded the halls. Alarms blared at the entryways as they watched. I did see some skirmishes between the rioters and Capitol police, but I also saw officers talking calmy, and even offering rioters directions. I cannot judge what might have been a life-or-death situation for many of the officers. Outnumbered and ill-equipped, it looked to me like many had decided that the Capitol was not worth dying over. I’ve documented similar mobs before, and I understand how quickly they can devour you. But many officers involved went much further than staying out of the way. While Democrats clearly understand the political value of highlighting officers who acted with valor against the rioters, the hearings must also scrutinize the other officers who were fraternizing with that same mob. It must focus on the related breakdowns that allowed the riot to go on for so long in the first place. Strategic failures to prevent the officers from being overrun led their chief to immediately resign in the aftermath; many officers didn’t have equipment because threat assessments were ignored. We deserve to know why—and what that may have had to do the many officers who, it appears, were less a force against the riot than ultimate participants in it. One Black officer at the hearing did call out his colleagues at the hearing for “catering to the rioters,” and questioned whether they would have been so gentle if the rioters were Black. But when another asserted the department would have treated Black Lives Matter protestors the same way, it went unchallenged. The select committee has the bulk of its fact-finding work ahead of it. It is early. But the decision to highlight these four officers at the agenda-setting first hearing, as essential and worthy as their experiences are to document, privileged a favorable view of police actions—with wall-to-wall press coverage, and future hearings as yet unscheduled—over the grimmer reality of what happened that day.Popular in News & Politics
- 最近发表
-
- Newborns hit new low, but births to those unmarried reach record high: data
- 艾如成为家乡旅游形象代言人
- Here's 20 sweet seconds of Ed Sheeran's brand new music
- Djokovic 'preparing' to play US Open
- Korea's economy to stop growing without drastic labor change: FKI
- USDA: 60% of North Koreans are food insecure
- N.K. expands work
- 9家猪企2024年目标总量将超1.3亿头,增长2000万头!
- Scientists discover where the huge dinosaur
- 西门大桥春节将全新亮相 实施交通管制
- 随机阅读
-
- 'Black Myth: Wukong' PS5 review in progress: A potential masterpiece
- 'Charmed' could be coming back to TV, but don't freak out yet
- Park’s ‘sick leave’ causes unease
- How to use GDPR to clean out your inbox once and for all
- PS5 Pro: There are new whispers that the release date is fast approaching
- [市地税]去年全市地税总收入破11亿
- Trump’s fast food spread at the White House has the internet talking
- N. Korea's COVID
- From Prairie Grasslands to Man
- Korea, U.S. have no plan to discuss THAAD at defense chiefs' meeting: Seoul
- An elaborate Instagram hoax is scamming influencers after luring them to Indonesia
- Mariah Carey continues to be an absolute icon with her 10
- 高燃!哨响表停赛不止,2024广东“村BA”开赛在即,一分钟带你重温高光瞬间。
- Trump’s fast food spread at the White House has the internet talking
- Vettel tips Mick to succeed him at Aston Martin
- An elaborate Instagram hoax is scamming influencers after luring them to Indonesia
- 多措并举优治理 绘就幸福新图景
- How to use GDPR to clean out your inbox once and for all
- Reed headlines Asian Tour events
- USDA: 60% of North Koreans are food insecure
- 搜索
-
- 友情链接
-