Senate Republicans confirm Lawrence VanDyke to the 9th Circuit.
The Senate confirmed Lawrence VanDyke to a lifetime appointment on the 9thU.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday by a vote of 51–44. Every Republican present except Sen. Susan Collins voted for the nomination; every Democrat present opposed it. Like Sarah Pitlyk, a judicial nominee confirmed just last week, VanDyke received a rare “Not Qualified” rating from the American Bar Association. After conducting 60 interviews, the ABA found that VanDyke has a reputation as “arrogant, lazy, an ideologue, and lacking in knowledge of the day-to-day practice including procedural rules.” Video of VanDyke lecturing, scolding, and interrupting judges during oral argument while serving as Nevada solicitor general lends credence to that assessment. VanDyke has a long record as an anti-LGBTQ activist. He wrote in 2004 that marriage equality “will hurt families, and consequentially children and society.” As the solicitor general of Montana, he advocated for the state to join two briefs alleging that legal recognition of same-sex relationships would harm children. The first claimed that prohibiting same-sex marriage promoted “optimal childrearing” because same-sex couples “cannot provide” the optimal “family structure.” And the second asserted that states “may rationally conclude” that “it is better” for parents to have a “biological” connection to their children. (The Supreme Court disagreed, ruling that a same-sex marriage ban “humiliates” the children of gay couples.) In 2010, VanDyke also filed a brief urging the Supreme Court to rule that student groups at public universities have a First Amendment right to discriminate against LGBTQ students. In light of this record, the ABA expressed concern over whether “VanDyke would be fair to persons who are gay, lesbian, or otherwise part of the LGBTQ community.” During VanDyke’s confirmation hearing, Missouri GOP Sen. Josh Hawley asked him if the ABA was right to worry. Do you believe, Hawley asked sympathetically, that you would treat LGBTQ litigants unfairly? “I do not believe that,” VanDyke said. Then he started crying. “It is a fundamental belief of mine that all people are created in the image of God,” he insisted. “They should all be treated with dignity and respect.” The victimizer had become the victim. VanDyke, a longtime member of the Federalist Society, brought that group’s priorities to the Montana solicitor general’s office. He threw the state into a case challenging a federal law banning those under 21 from buying handguns, arguing that the ban “probably does violate the original meaning of the Second Amendment” because “18-year-olds were part of the ‘militia.’ ” He also defended a bizarre Montana statute that attempted to nullify federal law by declaring Montana-made firearms “not subject to federal law or regulation.” In internal emails, VanDyke acknowledged that his argument may not pass “the straight-face test.” Unsurprisingly, VanDyke also co-authored a brief defending 20-week abortion bans and urging the Supreme Court to reconsider Roe v. Wade wholesale. Once VanDyke takes his seat, the 9thCircuit—which covers nine states and two territories—will be divided between 13 Republican appointees and 16 Democratic ones. Trump has reshaped the famously liberal court into a closely divided bench. It’s already paying off. Trump has a better chance of drawing a three-judge panel that includes a majority of Republican-appointed judges. And if the full court wants to review the panel’s decision, not every judge gets to participate. Instead, because the court is so big, 11 judges hear the case. These 11-judge panels are increasingly likely to have a conservative majority. Indeed, one such panel dominated by GOP appointees has already allowed Trump’s anti-abortion gag rule to take effect. The panel divided along party lines. Trump has now appointed more than a quarter of federal appellate judges, and seven judges rated “Not Qualified.” The vast majority of federal cases end in appeals courts, so judges like VanDyke will have the final say over numerous disputes of great importance. Even if, against all odds, the Senate’s upcoming impeachment trial results in a conviction, Trump’s impact on the country will continue through his judicial nominees for decades to come.Popular in News & Politics
- 最近发表
- 随机阅读
-
- It's Unnecessary But, AMD Is Basically Lying About CPU Performance
- 打造人居环境 扮靓汉源新城
- 春华秋实,“百千万”实景图纷至沓来
- “有事做心里踏实”——截瘫男子创业记
- 12 Sculptures Made From Recycled Materials
- 我市成立首家水生野生动物驯养繁殖养殖协会
- 宣传四川传统茶艺 提高茶艺师社会地位
- 胡长保小学 “知心姐姐”走进学生心灵世界
- The Eyes of Lacy
- 粽价上涨0.2—1.0元 端午“粽子战”打响
- “亲爱的,为买二套房,咱们离婚吧!”
- 6月1日起新版QS标志正式“上岗”
- [Graphic News] Average book price nears 20,000 won
- 圈养大熊猫野化培训重新启动
- 【农财网·蕉价】行情微涨,走货尚可
- 本周雨水较多天气较为凉爽
- Yes, big spiders are spreading in the U.S. No, they're not flying.
- 培育优良种猪走品质化道路
- 端午节,雅安艾草、菖蒲走俏
- 养好国“鳗”,中山坦洲续写养殖新篇章
- 搜索
-
- 友情链接
-